Complete your evidence synthesis in one workspace
Build a focused question, search 13 sources, screen studies, assess bias, run a meta-analysis, and report a PRISMA-aligned review.
13 health and science sources · 16 tools · Free account required to search
Example results · illustrative papers, not live search results
1,240 unique records after removing 610 duplicates
Community health worker interventions and maternal outcomes: a systematic review
BMJ Global Health · 2024 · 118 citationsPubMedEurope PMCEffect of home-visit programmes on maternal and neonatal mortality: a meta-analysis
The Lancet Global Health · 2023 · 96 citationsOpenAlexFree full textTask-shifting in antenatal care: a cluster randomised trial
PLOS Medicine · 2022 · 54 citationsClinicalTrials.gov
How the MPH workflow runs
Six stages, each with its own tool, connected so your work carries forward.
- Step 1
Plan
Frame a focused PICO or PECOT question and pick your review type.
- Step 2
Search
Query 13 scholarly and clinical sources at once.
- Step 3
Screen
Remove duplicates, then screen titles and abstracts with a second reviewer.
- Step 4
Extract
Capture study characteristics and outcomes in structured forms.
- Step 5
Appraise
Assess risk of bias, grade certainty, and pool results where appropriate.
- Step 6
Report
Produce PRISMA 2020 diagrams, forest plots, and Summary of Findings tables.
16 tools, grouped by stage
Use them in order or jump straight to the one you need.
Plan
Shape the question before you search.
Question Builder
Structure PICO and PECOT questions
Review Wizard
Step-by-step review workflow
Find
Search broadly and keep only what qualifies.
Literature Search
13 sources from one query
Deduplication
DOI and title matching across sources
Screening
Title and abstract screening with dual review
Citation Chaining
Forward and backward snowballing
Search Monitor
Alerts when new papers appear
Appraise and analyze
Judge the evidence, then combine it.
Data Extraction
Custom forms with PICO fields
Risk of Bias
RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and Newcastle-Ottawa
GRADE
Certainty ratings and Summary of Findings
Meta-Analysis
Pooled estimates, forest and funnel plots
Quality Score
ScholarEval scoring of your draft
Report
Document the review and prepare to submit.
PRISMA Generator
PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams
Reference Checker
Checks that citations support claims
Manuscript Reviewer
Feedback from a five-reviewer panel
Submission Checklist
Journal-ready reporting checklist
Where it searches
13 health and science sources. Duplicates across sources are merged. Coverage and availability vary by source.
MPH questions
What review types can I complete?
Systematic reviews, scoping reviews, meta-analyses, and evidence-based capstones, from question development through reporting.
Which sources does the search cover?
PubMed, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, Crossref, Europe PMC, medRxiv, bioRxiv, DOAJ Health, PLOS, PMC Full Text, WHO IRIS, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar. Coverage and availability vary by source.
How are duplicates removed?
Records are matched on DOI and on near-identical titles with the same year, then merged so each study appears once with the best metadata from every source.
Can I get the full text?
Free full-text links appear when a source offers one, such as PubMed Central or an open-access journal. Paywalled papers link to the publisher page.
Can I rely on the AI output?
Treat it as a starting point. Verify claims, extracted data, and suggested assessments against the original studies before using them in academic work.
Mastering Scholar assists your research. It does not replace the original papers, faculty supervision, or your own methodological judgment.
Build a review you can document
Create a free account and start with your public health question.
Create a free account